I don’t think it’s a good thing at all to have unnecessary duplicates.
Feel free to ask people who have had Odido in recent years, but have been without services for weeks or even months due to a malfunction. There was no alternative, 1.2.3. Switching without redemption was not possible and you had to make do with a voucher for mobile data. In such a case, it would be great if you could purchase another ISP via a different fiber so that you can still work from home, etc.
Don’t forget that in the event of malfunctions, many shops are dependent on technicians and that technicians at Odido (Guidion), for example, can sometimes be very difficult to get services up and running again.
Waste. KPN should just make agreements with those who have already provided infrastructure. Opening up streets for unnecessary things and not opening them up for necessary things is bizarre.
Want to make KPN appointments? You know that this can and will frustrate other fiber optic infrastructures? KPN has started construction again because they felt the competition from ODF and Delta in their neck. If KPN only has to make agreements, you will only get really undesirable situations.
KPN: Guys, we are going to moor in Lutjebroek. ODF and Delta, oh we don’t have those on the schedule yet. Okay, then we won’t put it there.
Odido: Guys, we are going to moor in Klaaswaal, KPN and Delta, oh we don’t have those on the schedule yet. Okay, then we won’t put it there.
Delta: Guys, we are going to moor in Eygelshoven, KPN and Odido, oh we don’t have those on the schedule yet. Okay, then we won’t put it there.
And so we have three places that do not receive fiber optic because mutual agreements have to be made or because a government or municipality determines that parties must work together. I must say that I think it is a fantastic idea, because it is about time that the naive experience in practice that a government, municipality or partnership will actually frustrate things.
Tags: Telecompaper Dutch homes double fiber optic connections Pro News
